A study on mobile county justice system with juvenile and adult offenders

To assure that the adjudication and disposition of a child alleged or found to have committed a violation of Florida law be exercised with appropriate discretion and in keeping with the seriousness of the offense and the need for treatment services, and that all findings made under this chapter be based upon facts presented at a hearing that meets the constitutional standards of fundamental fairness and due process. It is therefore the purpose of the Legislature to provide authority for the state to contract with community substance abuse treatment providers for the development and operation of specialized support and overlay services for the delinquency system, which will be fully implemented and utilized as resources permit. In addition, it is the policy of the state to: The Legislature finds that detention should be used only when less restrictive interim placement alternatives prior to adjudication and disposition are not appropriate.

A study on mobile county justice system with juvenile and adult offenders

These courts also arose from a growing belief that instead of being "miniature adults", children and adolescents possess moral and cognitive capabilities that are not quite fully developed. This process is controversial, due to concerns about the difference between the cognitive and moral capabilities of juveniles vs.

Supporters of the abolition of juvenile court, however, argue that prosecuting juvenile offenders in criminal court offers better protection to society and holds juveniles responsible for their actions. One of the most significant differences is the intent of the two systems; the focus of the juvenile justice system is on rehabilitation and future reintegration, while the goal of the criminal justice system is punishment and deterrence of future crime.

In juvenile court rulings, decisions often take psychosocial factors into account along with current offense severity and the youth's offense history. In contrast, in criminal proceedings, the severity of the offense and criminal history weigh most heavily in sentencing outcome.

Upon release, those who pass through the juvenile justice system receive parole -like surveillance along with reintegration programs, reflecting the belief that juvenile behavior can be changed. Those released from prison receive surveillance which serves to monitor and report illegal behavior.

Juvenile court judges have the ability to transfer juveniles to criminal court, usually takes into account age and severity of offense Prosecutorial Discretion: Prosecutors have the authority to file cases in juvenile court or criminal court jurisdiction Statutory Exclusion: State laws that require juveniles to be tried in criminal court if any previous crimes were seen in criminal court Twenty-three states have no minimum age in at least one judicial waiver or statutory exclusion provision allowing for the transfer of juveniles to adult court.

A study on mobile county justice system with juvenile and adult offenders

In states where a minimum age is specified for all transfer provisions, age 14 is the most common minimum age. Other offenses included property offenses In a study that looked at 1, youths, from ten to 17 years of age, it was found that females, non-Hispanic whites, and younger juveniles were less likely to be tried in criminal court than males, African Americans, Hispanics, and older youths.

When the juveniles who were sentenced in criminal court were compared to the juveniles sentenced in juvenile court, those youth who were sentenced to adult prison had greater odds of having a disruptive behavior disordera substance abuse disorder, or affective and anxiety disorders.

A study on mobile county justice system with juvenile and adult offenders

These critics state that the boundary between juvenile and adult is no longer as clear, as children appear to grow up faster, with more exposure to adult ideas, and as adults more often engage in juvenile behaviors and activities. Other critical beliefs of the juvenile justice system are that the system allows for youth to escape the consequences of their actions.

This then leads to further predation of society. This debate centers around the cognitive and moral capacities of juveniles. There have been numerous attempts to conceptualize and organize the abilities needed to be deemed a competent defendant in criminal court.

Competency can be defined as the ability to assist counsel and the ability to engage in proficient reasoning and judgment-making. To demonstrate proficient reasoning and judgment in court-related matters, a defendant must understand that counsel will provide insight and aid, know when it is beneficial to waive certain rights, and comprehend repercussions of certain options within court proceedings.

It was found in this study that approximately one third of to year-olds and approximately one fifth of 14 to 15 year olds are as impaired in capacities relevant to adjudicative competence as are seriously mentally ill adults who would likely be considered incompetent to stand trial.

A study that looked exclusively at juveniles 16—17 years old who were directly filed to criminal court i. First, juveniles have less experience in life. They are less likely to perceive risks and less likely to contemplate how present actions might affect their future situations.

These at-risk adolescents are more often subjected to influences from other troublemaking youth, and opposing these influences has the possibility of resulting in poor outcomes, such as being rejected, suffering ridicule or being physically accosted.

Departments | Anne Arundel County, MD

Incompetent juveniles are significantly younger than their counterpart competent juveniles, they are more likely to be wards of the state, more likely to be receiving special education services, and more likely to have suffered previous abuse. These beliefs show a lack of juveniles' understanding of one's right against self-incrimination.

When comparing juveniles and adults, juveniles are much more likely to refuse to talk to an attorney, even though it is the attorney's duty to help. When juveniles are asked if they trust their attorney, only 6. In a mock jury study, when looking at a case of a previously maltreated juvenile charged with murder, the juvenile defendant was held at less fault by the jury when she was accused of killing her abuser.

The offender's age and level of offense ex.

The Odessa File: Government of Schuyler County

The older an offender is and the more serious his crime, the more likely the public is willing to transfer him. Neither criminal history nor victim information has been found to influence public willingness to transfer.

African-Americans are also more likely than any other race to be targeted for transfer to criminal court. The two other most important factors include age of offender and the offender's criminal history.

However, seriousness of offense and age of offender outweigh whether the juvenile is a 1st time or a repeat offender in attitudes toward transfer. Whether repeat offender or not the psychological and mental state of the child has everything to do with whether the child will repeat the offense over again.

These include a juvenile offender not being forced to serve time in an adult prison, or with adult prisoners. Extreme sanctions such as the death penalty are generally not handed down to minors.Report cites weak reporting on missing, killed Native women.

by Mary Hudetz, The Associated Press, November 14, Researchers at the Urban Indian Health Institute examined data from 71 U.S. cities and identified cases of Missing and Murdered Indigenous women and Girls (MMIWG).

Historical timeline. Race has been a factor in the United States criminal justice system since the system's beginnings, as the nation was founded on Native American soil. It continues to be a factor throughout United States history through the present. Purpose. In the wake of high-profile incidents in Ferguson, Staten Island, North Charleston, Baltimore, and elsewhere, law enforcement agencies across the country have rapidly adopted body-worn cameras for .

give juveniles better protection through due process provisions and procedural safeguards. that both juvenile and adult offenders are volitional and responsible human beings and, consequently, deserve to be punished if they violate the law.

Pierce County Tacoma Avenue S Tacoma, WA ; Helpful Links. Staff Directory; Jobs; News; Property Taxes; How Are We Doing? Jul 26,  · The biggest crime in the U.S. criminal justice system is that it is a race-based institution where African-Americans are directly targeted and punished in .

Police Body Worn Cameras: A Policy Scorecard